Another unprofessional attempt by Government to topple DSAI . Malaysiakini reported that there isn’t any evidence that Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan was sodomised, according to the doctor who examined him four hours before he lodged a police report alleging he was sexually assaulted by PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim.
The news sparked out this morning when Malaysia-today Blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin wrote in his blog :
“At 2.00pm on 28 June 2008, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan went to see Dr Mohamed Osman to complain about a pain he is suffering in his anus. Saiful told the doctor that he had been assaulted by ‘a very important person’ — meaning, of course, sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim.
Dr Mohamed Osman examined Saiful but found no evidence that he had been sodomised, either by Anwar Ibrahim or anyone else for that matter. The doctor’s report (which can be viewed below) says that there is zero (0) skin tearing, zero (0) active bleeding, zero (0) traces of pus, etc., which basically means he can’t be suffering from a pain in the anus as what he alleges.
The doctor’s diagnosis is that he rules out or TRO (to rule out) assault (sodomised). In short: Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan is not suffering any pain in the anus and neither was he assaulted or sodomised in the anus. ”
Here is the copy of said Medical report :
The issue now is that Who Sodomise who? It look’s like Najib on his way to climb up political ladder sodomising Malaysian using his previous boss technique.
Since, Najib’s way to sodomise Malaysian set to fail after Anwar’s arrest drama ABB drop bombshell that UMNO in discussion with PAS. Will this strategy able to tear apart Pakatan Rakyat.
While, the top level politician and administrators busy sodomising each others. Let us get into our work.
Related posts |
S Manikavasagam is the elected MP of Kapar(P.109).He stood under the PKR ticket.He is also in the Environmental Committee(opposition).














Jul 28, 2008 at 17:16:12
Tulisan Doktor diatas:
Mengadu sakit bont*t
Sakit kat lubang dubur masa buang air besar selama seminggu
Pesakit mengadu di”serang”..
Pemeriksaan fizikal
am
tidak pucat
tidak demam
Pemeriksaan per rectum/ lubang bont*t
Tiada pendarahan aktif
tiada parut
tiada luka
tiada nanah
Diagnosis
TRO “serangan”
(Pesakit bercadang untuk pergi ke hospital kerajaan) Untuk membuat laporan polis…
Analisis.
Mangsa (kononnya) telah pergi ke hospital swasta utk membuat pemeriksaan.
Dalam kes ini, pegawai perubatan yang terlibat (bukan pakar) telah membuat pemeriksaan dan didapati tiada langsung kesan dakwaan mangsa (kononnya)
Jadi routine biasa, pegawai perubatan terbabit akan mencadangkan kepada mangsa (kononnya) supaya terus pergi ke Hospital kerajaan utk 2nd opinion dan utk mendapapatkan laporan yang lebih valid (legally) dan memudahkan urusan laporan polis.
Untuk pengetahuan korang… medico legal kes selalunya akan di rujuk ke hospital kerajaan yang terdekat kerana banyak kes medico legal memerlukan verifikasi dari pakar hospital kerajaan.
Dan dalam laporan awal ini… si sepol nampaknya tiada langsung tanda2 diliwat…